[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Minor? problem making gcl-2.6.8pre on a Mac
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Minor? problem making gcl-2.6.8pre on a Mac |
Date: |
15 Jan 2008 13:47:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings!
"Donald Winiecki" <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks Gaby, for the command like to get make.log, though for some
> reason, it's still not being created. I listed the make process to the
> screen and culled through it but don't find the same error that Raymond
> is describing below on a Win32 build.
>
This is because the issue is in xgcl-2, which is omitted on windows as
there is no X.
Take care,
> _don
>
> >>> Donald Winiecki 1/13/2008 10:02:28 PM >>>
> This looks similar to what is happening in the Win32 build of 2.6.8pre
> (no gcl.bat file created), though for some reason I'm not getting the
> log file written when I run 'make,' so I can't confirm the error or
> error location during the process (the 'install.lsp' file isn't being
> loaded and this is what's stopping the 'gcl.bat' file from being created
> during the Win32 build).
>
> I can confirm that 'saved_gcl.exe' is created in the Win32 build (cltl1
> version), so something else is happening with the Macintosh build when
> it comes to that.
>
> I'll look into why I'm not getting a make.log, and when I can get one
> created I'll check for something similar to what Jeff is reporting.
>
> _don winiecki
>
> >>> Raymond Toy <address@hidden> 1/13/2008 8:29:25 PM >>>
> address@hidden wrote:
> > Everything seemed to go well until:
> > XLIB>pdflatex dwdoc.tex
> > make[1]: pdflatex: Command not found
> > make[1]: *** [dwdoc.pdf] Error 127
> > make: *** [unixport/saved_gcl] Error 2
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >
> > I ended up with no "gcl" script in "bin", and
> > no unixport/saved_gcl, though there is a unixport/saved_pre_gcl.
>
> I just commented out the dependency to dwdoc.pdf. Then the build
> finishes and creates the expected binaries. I don't know what is
> missing (other than the pdf file) if you don't build dwdoc.pdf.
>
> Unless dwdoc.pdf is really, really necessary, I think it would be
> better
> to separate the building of the executable from the building of the
> pdf/documentation files.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah