[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Ghm-discuss] Re: GHM in review
From: |
Sam Geeraerts |
Subject: |
[Ghm-discuss] Re: GHM in review |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:49:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100402) |
Andy Wingo schreef:
> 1. What was great about the meeting? Name one or two of your favorite
> things.
- Meeting other free distro folk and some of the GNU people I heard about.
- Learning about projects that I didn't know much about yet.
- Close to where I live.
> 2. What could have been better? Again, one or two things, along with
> suggestions for improvements if you have them.
- Acoustics were not too great, which made it hard to understand the
speaker sometimes. Maybe only open the windows between talks next time.
- The keysigning was not very orderly. Perhaps as a keysigning newbie I
was partly responsible for messing it up, though. :)
> 3. Was there anything missing from the meeting? Or, alternately, was
> there some part of the meeting we could have done without?
Proper beer would have been nice. ;)
> 4. What about focus -- did we have a good focus? Too broad, too
> narrow?
I liked it how it was: a main theme + other topics.
> 5. What about the size? Do you want the GHM to be bigger in the
> future? How would you feel if there were 100 people there?
The small scale was one of the great things about the meeting for me. I
find people more approachable then (and easier to find :) ). 100 people
is still cool, I'd say.
> 6. What about colocation? Did this influence your decision to attend?
> Was it a good thing or a bad thing?
It influenced Karl to attend, which in turn influenced me to attend, so
seems like a good thing.
> 7. Any other comments?
Thanks for making this happen.