Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS

[Vijay Bellur]

On 01/02/2014 09:26 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 06:32 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> > On 12/31/2013 04:53 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
> > > Here is the last Coverity scan report in 2013 for master branch of
> > > GlusterFS. I have tried to cover the whole code base for this Coverity
> > > scan by enabling possible translators. Happy new year Gluster Ants :)
> >
> > Thanks, Lala and Happy new year to you too! :)
> >
> > > Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to GlusterFS
> > > found with Coverity Scan.
> > >
> > > Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
> > > Showing 7 of 291 defect(s)
> >
> > Avati, Brian: All these errors seem to be coming from the imported qemu
> > code. Do we mark them as false positives as we probably do not intend
> > fixing them?
>
> That's what I would vote for, or to just skip scanning the imported qemu
> code if that is an option..?

Makes sense. There seems to be an option for skipping certain 
directories and I have added a filter to avoid getting issues reported 
from contrib/*.

-Vijay