gnash-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog libbase/string_table.cpp libbas...


From: zou lunkai
Subject: Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog libbase/string_table.cpp libbas...
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:36:23 +0800

> > class A : B : C
> >
> >       C.m is a getter-setter
> >       B.m is a normal property
> >       A.m doesn't exist
> >
> > When setting A.m, the getter-setter should be invoked.

Tried the above tests,  confrimed that the setter should be invoked.
See testing code below:

C = new Object();
B = new Object();  B.__proto__ = C;
A = new Object();  A.__proto__ = B;

mGetter = function() {
        return this._m
};
mSetter = function (x) {
        check(this == _root.A);
};

B.m = 100;
C.addProperty("m", mGetter, mSetter);

check(C.hasOwnProperty('m'));
check(B.hasOwnProperty('m'));
check(! A.hasOwnProperty('m'));

A.m = 1;   //  trigger the setter,  got  4 checks in total.


--zou



On 10/24/07, Chad Musick <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Chad, it seems this change broke something, see my new test in 
> > actionscript.all/Object.as
> >
> > This is the problem:
> >
> > class A : B : C
> >
> >       C.m is a getter-setter
> >       B.m is a normal property
> >       A.m doesn't exist
> >
> > When setting A.m, the getter-setter should be invoked.
> > findProperty would find B.m and return that while findGetterSetter would
> > find C.m.
> >
> > No idea about the new isStatic thing.
> >
> > --strk;
>
> Has this behavior been verified in the proprietary player?  It's most
> definitely wrong for AS3, since the scope rules ensure that B.m will
> make C.m invisible to A  -- I can put in a version test (AS2 or AS3) if
> this is the way that AS2 is 'supposed' to operate.
>
> Chad
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnash-commit mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]