[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_f
From: |
Rob Savoye |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51 |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:04:36 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 09/07/11 09:53, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> Does it make it a choice which can be voted on by the gnash developers ?
This is not a democracy, we don't vote. :-) You really need to work on
"agreeing to disagree", as you have a bad tendency to assume you are
always correct, and no other opinions are valid. When developers can't
agree, it's up to the maintainer to decide, which is still me...
However, I am willing to let the FB be built by 'auto', even though I
dislike 'auto'. Since the FB GUI has no dependencies, it probably
doesn't really need to be 'auto', as it should always build without
problem. What's more likely to be 'auto' is the touchscreen support,
which optionally uses 'tslib'. It can also use the standard Linux input
events too, which has no external dependencies.
Thinking of touchscreens, we seriously lack a utility to calibrate the
touchscreen for Gnash usage...
- rob -
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/03
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/03
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/03
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51,
Rob Savoye <=
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07