Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1982-g66b47f4

[Sandro Santilli]

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:33:42AM +0200, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
> I presume that if I had written > 1 that would have broken single-bit
> reads (if there are any). It is enough, I think, to ensure that the
> bitshift is not negative.

Then I keep not understanding this.
Here's the snippet:

>>>> SWFStream::read_sint(unsigned short bitcount)
>>>> {
>>>>     assert(bitcount > 0);

Now I get it. You're asserting for it to be != 0, basically.
Sorry for the noise.

--strk;