[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gNewSense-users] Browser (was: GNASH?)
From: |
Andreas K. Foerster |
Subject: |
[gNewSense-users] Browser (was: GNASH?) |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Nov 2006 16:40:01 +0100 (MET) |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Am Samstag, dem 04. Nov 2006 schrieb Dave Crossland:
> >How about Epiphany?
>
> The value of Firefox/Iceweasel is the universe of extensions
> available. Though I see
>
> "The Epiphany Extensions package is what you will need. Epiphany runs
> all the same popular plugins that run in Mozilla."
> - http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/
>
> http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/extensions suggests that only
> those extensions listed work.
Extensions and plugins are a different matter.
"Plugins" are for what you can see in the webpages. They are to render
specific file-formats, not directly supported by the browser software.
Plugins can be shared between all Mozilla based browsers.
"Extensions" are extensions to the browser, ie. what you can get from
the browser-menus. They are specific to the several browsers.
> I use GPL extentions not on the list, like customizegoogle.com. When I
> get home I'll test this, unless anyone replies with the answer :-)
That seems to be a browser specific entension.
--
AKFoerster
Re: [gNewSense-users] GNASH?, Dave Crossland, 2006/11/04
Re: [gNewSense-users] GNASH?, Marcos Guglielmetti, 2006/11/03