Re: [gNewSense-users] kernel licence - solved!

[marco\.chieppa-crap]

HI!

i wrote tho the FSF about the non-licenced files in the
kernel. They answer me we can consider that files under the
same licence of the kernel (gpl_v2).

this is their reply:

>Unless you have some reason to believe otherwise, it is
fair to assume
>that files in a project that do not have an explicit
license header have
>the same license as the project itself. So, when you
encounter files in
>the kernel Linux that don't have license headers, you
should treat them
>as if they were released under GPLv2 only.
>
>If you have further questions, please feel free to contact us.
>
>Best regards
>