gnewsense-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gNewSense-users] Re: Do we bother with digest at all?


From: Karl Goetz
Subject: [gNewSense-users] Re: Do we bother with digest at all?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:37:27 +1030

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:23:02 +1030
Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:08:38 +0300
> Niklas Cholmkvist <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > maybe it's better to copy and paste the subject you are replying to.
> > Change "Re: gNewSense-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 11" to something
> > meaningful.
> > 
> > Cheers
> 
> On this subject,
> Should we have digest at all? This list is around 10 messages a day,
> which isn't all that much by anyones standards.
> kk

I didn't see much opposition to removing digest (or convincing reasons
it should stay). I will look into removing it at a later date (it seems
pretty low priority to me ...).
kk

- -- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkrYRd8ACgkQhIBzgCf88S5SbACeJLJATk+zCxBk82ltBsetcoMT
/sAAnibiVgM4EHYIDQenjqaRqrzFfZbg
=wsI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]