gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] tla revert


From: Miles Bader
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] tla revert
Date: 07 Sep 2003 23:49:18 +0900

Damien Elmes <address@hidden> writes:
> > They run undo and the changes are gone. Then they make more
> > changes that they like, and submit a changeset up to the maintainer. Will
> > the maintainer see evidence of the work that was previously undone?
> 
> Nope - it's left around as ',,undo-n' where n is an undo number. That
> denotes a 'junk' file which is never to go into changesets. It just
> sits around in the working directory.

... and just to make the point clear, N gets incremented with each undo,
and redo will pick the highest numbered ,,undo-N, and redo that only,
deleting the redone ,,undo-N dir.

You can have various undone changesets sitting around, and it's
perfectly safe to undo even good changes to quickly work on some other
bug for a while -- you don't need to worry about one undo overwriting
the previous one.  You can also move the ,,undo-N dir somewhere else in
case you'd like to revisit those changes later...

It's generally just very useful.

-Miles
-- 
Is it true that nothing can be known?  If so how do we know this?  -Woody Allen




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]