[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > I don't suppose that anyone in the gnu-arch-users community feels the
> > urge to take on forking GNU patch? It would be a medium-long term
> > commitment and being a conservative unix pedant would help.
> Do you find the maintainer uncooperative, or do you want to make
> controversial changes?
Neither. It doesn't have to be an unfriendly fork. Just one that
thinks about arch issues (of which there are now a few).
I've mostly given up on dealing with the GNU maintainers of core apps
-- but perhaps or perhaps not that is premature in this case.
The GNU page for patch, http://www.gnu.org/software/patch/, offers no
contact points.
-t
p.s.: personally, I think that undergrad education should consist of
things like clean-rooming the core apps and kernels -- but undoubtedly
that is a minority view (at the moment).
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, (continued)
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, John Goerzen, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, Tom Lord, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, Miles Bader, 2003/09/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, Tom Lord, 2003/09/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, Miles Bader, 2003/09/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: --skip-present implemented, Miles Bader, 2003/09/11