[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:10:27PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew Suffield <address@hidden>
>
> >>> [version numbers model development paterns]
>
> > A common counterexample would be config.sub and config.guess.
>
> >>> In what sense are they a counter-example. Sorry -- I just don't
> >>> follow you here.
>
> > They don't have version numbers.
>
> That'd be a process bug, if you ask me. Surely they make a series of
> releases, no?
The files have date stamps embedded in them, to identify them. I'm not
sure if they're ever formally released.
> > > > A slightly more topical one might be the branches in which I
> store
> > > > debian packaging (which does have a version number, but that
> version
> > > > number is not related to its development at all - it's related
> to t=
> > he
> > > > development of the corresponding _upstream_ code).
>
> > > To your consumers, isn't that structuring from upstream the critical
> > > thing?
>
> > > Really not seeing your point here, sorry.
>
> > In this example, the version numbers bear no relationship to the lines
> > of development - so I set the version field to something arbitrary
> > ("1.0") and ignore it completely. Development here is entirely
> > orthogonal to the version number.
>
> (Really not sure how important this is to anything, but:)
>
> Do I have this right: You have some packaging. The union of the
> packaging with the upstream stuff consitutes the debian package.
>
> Is there some reason why the version number of the appropriate
> packaging doesn't equal the version number of the upstream foo?
> Isn't that how it's used even if, by coincidence, there's no changes
> in the packaging stuff between upstream versions?
If I were to use this version number for tla, it would force me to
branch and tag every time the upstream version changed. That's highly
inappropriate.
There *is* a version number, but it is *not* related to the pattern of
development.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
pgpmovly4pOgk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/11
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/11
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: What are version numbers?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: What are version numbers?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/10