[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Amendment to Path Problems
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Amendment to Path Problems |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:23:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sep 23 2003, Michael wrote:
> I'm an idiot. This is no command length issue(well it may be a combination
> of the two), it is a depth problem. Windows doesn't seem to support more
> than 23-24 directories deep. This is a much less trivial problem to solve,
> but for arch to gain widespread popularity as CVS has, this problem must be
> addressed. For my limited skills with C I will be happy to do what I can,
> I just need a nudge in the proper direction. The bigger question this
> raises is how does this affect overall `arch'itecture?
I don't think the depth issue is the worst problem -- it's the total
length of the path, no? Hence all the questions about normalising the
branch/version names in the archive (from
cat/cat--branch/cat--branch--version to cat/branch/version, possibly
with cat/=null/version in case of empty branch labels).
Stig
--
brautaset.org