[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: practical questions of archive ownership
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: practical questions of archive ownership |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:14:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:48:09PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Still, I'm curious what will happen in the future with emacs and other
> projects where there _isn't_ a strong central maintainer, and where the
> notion of a gate-keeper for the canonical sources is unlikely to be
> acceptable. It may be that, as now, people do initial development/testing
> in their own archive/branch, but merge into a shared central
> archive/branch.
Here you want a patch queue manager. Your central archive then belongs
to a program which does all the merging (conflicts are "handled" by
bouncing the group of changes - no conflict resolution occurs in this
archive). Developers just pitch bundles of changesets at it; it can
also be responsible for running test suites and/or something like
tinderbox. Arbitrary criteria can be implemented for what changes are
allowed (like "must not cause it to fail to build").
[I've been working out the design for such a tool bit by bit, and
intend to implement one sometime in the next couple of months]
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature