[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks |
Date: |
02 Oct 2003 11:28:53 +0900 |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> Tobias> But when there's a checkout hook-script you have almost
> Tobias> zero chances looking at the code in question before it's
> Tobias> already too late.
>
> Oh, c'mon. Tom surely would allow you to defeat the script execution.
But I think it's the default which is important. Typing `make' is
potentially dangerous, but people are very used to the concept, and if
they have some doubts about the sources, it's a well-defined and
familiar point before which they can assume things are safe.
-Miles
--
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch hooks, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/01
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [OT] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/02
- Re: [OT] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/02
- Re: [OT] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/03
- Re: [OT] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/03