[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dyn
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:23:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Just when I say "ignore Linux" :-)
> From: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden>
> (via) From: Momchil Velikov <address@hidden>
> There's two things about bitkeeper: (a) it does get the distribution
> right, and (b) is is actually very polished.
> I think you get (a), but (b) includes things like the patch import system
> that has an automatic "renametool",
Yup. I'm surprised that a "changeset-utils" package hasn't yet
struck anyone with time to work on it as a good project to start.
> And of course, the sanity checking has actually found problems at times.
> It ends up beign the slowest part of most BK operations (doing a full
> checksum verification), but it's made BK bugs (they've happened a few
> times) be noticed immediately rather than corrupt the tree, and it has
> also several times found dodgy hardware or some kernel bugs.
That can fit right in, easily enough, especially as the
inode-signature optimization improves.
We also ought to get serious about discussing cryptographic signatures
at some point.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02