[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:49:40 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
[,,patch-set in revlibs]
> For consecutive revisions, as now, it might have some meaning, but it's
> still redundant.
With the archive? Yes, deliberately so.
> For sparse revisions it has no meaning at all unless I calculated teh
> patchset from the previous revision up to the built one.
Bzzt. The ,,patch-set in revision X of the revlib should contain the
changeset (if any) associated with revision X --- not a summary from
the previous thing in the revlib.
> I should build a ,,patchset from patch-n to patch-m. I dont' think it's
> worh it, that's something that sould not be there.
No. You should just stash the (uncompressed, untarred) changeset for
patch-m there.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02