[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6 |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:14:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> I'd be against (and I think Tom too) putting any kind of FS-specific
> optimisations in Arch. Checking the FS is not enough, under FreeBSD for
> instance, we don't have hashed directories on-disk but with UFS_HASHDIR in
> the kernel, an in-memory hash table is maintained.
ext3 without hashing doesn't have problems with access ordered by
inodes. I would assume traditional UFS is similar.
- [Gnu-arch-users] readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Miles Bader, 2003/10/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Miles Bader, 2003/10/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Ollivier Robert, 2003/10/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Momchil Velikov, 2003/10/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Ollivier Robert, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: readdir() optimization for ext3/Linux 2.6,
Florian Weimer <=