[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit
From: |
Joshua Haberman |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:02:11 -0700 |
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 13:00, Tom Lord wrote:
> But look, ultimately it's a cost/value trade-off. You think the cost
> is low enough? You do it. Go ahead -- do a good job of transforming
> libarch to be binding friendly. Probably only take a week or
> two....
I was under the impression that you were fundamentally opposed to seeing
libarch wrappers. If it's just a question of who will do the work, then
we have no argument.
Josh
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Joshua Haberman, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Joshua Haberman, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Joshua Haberman, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit,
Joshua Haberman <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Michael Teichgräber, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Michael Teichgräber, 2003/10/20