[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla
From: |
zander |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:42:18 +0200 |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:04:15PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:39:41PM +0300, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> > Miles> Why should it be deprecated? It seems like a coherent and
> > Miles> useful function...
> >
> > Unneeded maybe? Together with ``star-merge --refernce''. Can't arch
> > track continuation chains until it finds the common ancestor all by
> > itself (what is what expected to happen in the first place).
>
> Maybe star-merge doesn't need it, but other merging strategies may. Since
> join-branch `makes sense' as a standalone function (to somebody that knows
> about patch-logs), it seems a bit premature to delete it just because
> star-merge doesn't need it...
If it is as similar to the 'cvs up -j' command as it sounds I suggest keeping
it; makes those people feel at home :-)
--
Thomas Zander
pgp3Itlx70dlB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Momchil Velikov, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Robin Farine, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Momchil Velikov, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Robin Farine, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Miles Bader, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Momchil Velikov, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Miles Bader, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla,
zander <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Merge problems with tla, Robin Farine, 2003/10/21