[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:52:12 +1000 |
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 12:54, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Andrew Suffield <address@hidden>
>
> > ENOSPC is not a fatal error. It is a temporary error. It is not
> > appropriate to abort when it occurs, regardless of whether you are
> > writing to a pipe or to a file.
>
> Which isn't to say you can't wind up with a perpetually disk-filling
> positive feedback loop that way. (At least there's `kill(1)'.).
gdm did that to me for a while - there was a bug and the xsession errors
log wasn't limited in size. Combine that with a error spewing gaim, and
....
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/23