[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7 |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:54:35 +0100 (CET) |
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Pau Aliagas wrote:
>
> > > > He was using tla-devo-1.0 without the inode signatures optimization.
> > > > These are the things that should make into a decent howto :)
> > >
> > > Does it mean that inode signatures optimization is supported for explicit
> > > tagging method. That would be great news for me! (sorry, but I don't
> > > follow Arch's development these days...)
> >
> > I'm afraid not but... no need for it if you use hardlinked trees :)
>
> Really?
Well, I think so.
> > Patch would detect the identical inodes and optimize it anyway.
>
> I guess you mean mkpatch, right? If so, then I would only need to know how
> to learn my emacs to break hard-links when editing file. :-)
Or suffer the consequences!
Pau
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, John Goerzen, 2003/10/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7, zander, 2003/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7, zander, 2003/10/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/10/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/10/28