[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:12:16 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Robert Anderson <address@hidden>
> > Why don't you use some non-local transport for that archive, then?
> Because I want the local performance (but it's a negotiable point).
> However, I don't think it solves the problem, does it? The only
> transport available to me is sftp, and I wouldn't know how to solve the
> problem there, either.
Because the user that the sftp daemon runs as owns all the files and
directories in the archive.
Oh... I see... you're thinking that to use SFTP you have to give each
member of your group a distinct login. No, that isn't what I had in
mind. Perhaps I'm violating your "no new accounts" constraint.
> > Alternatively, looking (at least briefly) back at the Xouvert thread,
> > it seems we overlooked a sane solution at that time (blush. But then
> > that's why I proposed the "make a new savannah account" solution after
> > all - to buy time to think):
> > While I would be against the "copy permissions" hack and against a
> > "tla umask" command, I would not be against support for archive
> > URLs of the forms (suitably adjusted if I've violated uri syntax):
> > file%umask=XXX://path/to/your/archive
> > sftp%umask=XXX:/address@hidden/path/to/your/archive
> > sftp:/%umask=XXX,address@hidden/path/to/your/archive
> > etc.
> That's how you'd register the archive, I presume?
Right.
"morally speaking", these would just be extensions to the capability
of a transport rather than changes to the "dumb server" model of arch.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Anderson, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Dustin Sallings, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Anderson, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, zander, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robin Farine, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23