[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:49:44 -0800 (PST) |
> From: address@hidden
> > > From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. This is how url's are formed: there's no
choice
> > > about it.
> > I don't think so. Cites?
> read the RFC.
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html
This is a very long document. Scanning it, I see no specific language
that covers this case. So, would you care to cite the specific
language that you think applies?
> 3.1 says that the % is not allowed where you put it for example.
> > > A URL as a uniform locator isn't intrinsically client or server
side.
> > > Indeed for something like http://, a URL doesn't define *many*
aspected
> > > of the request: PUT vs POST ve GET cs SEARCH vs ....
> > PUT, POST, GET, etc. are parts of the http protocol.
> ...
> > They modify the path, not the protocol. The umask thing modifies the
> > protocol.
> So by this reasoning there should also be a http%method=POST: protocol.
> Thats just silly.
No, that is not analogous reasoning.
To properly use the URI of an sftp- or file-accessible archive with a
umask setting, a client must use a different protocol than it would
when using sftp: or file:. You could regard the umask varients as
new protocols that happen to be layered on sftp: and file: but are,
nevertheless, distinct from them.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, zander, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robin Farine, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, zander, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, zander, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23