[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc)
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc) |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:21:13 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Ah, finally ...
> If you use these options with `tla get' will that somehow be remembered,
> and reflected in future updates/replays? If not, what happens?
updates and replays will break links of files the modify.
It has occured to me that perhaps we want a `link-sync' command or
similar to make a tree as close as possible to a link tree from a
given library revision.
> What about using `--link' (short -l), like the cp command, instead of
> `--hard-links'? Besides the commonality, and the difference in length
> [I don't think `hard' is a very important attribute to emphasize -- as
> with cp and ln, symbolic links are the exception], there's the issue of
> whether options are `descriptive' or `imperative' -- I find obviously
> imperative options like `--link' a lot more natural (a similar case
> occurs with `tla changes --diffs' -- I constantly find myself typing
> --diff instead, despite having used that command zillions of times).
Personally, I have no particular opinion abou that.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Tom Lord, 2003/12/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Robert Collins, 2003/12/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Miles Bader, 2003/12/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc),
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Miles Bader, 2003/12/01
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Tom Lord, 2003/12/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Miles Bader, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Charles Duffy, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Stig Brautaset, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Charles Duffy, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Tom Lord, 2003/12/02