[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc)
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc) |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:07:06 +1100 |
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 09:21, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
>
> > Ah, finally ...
>
> > If you use these options with `tla get' will that somehow be remembered,
> > and reflected in future updates/replays? If not, what happens?
>
> updates and replays will break links of files the modify.
>
> It has occured to me that perhaps we want a `link-sync' command or
> similar to make a tree as close as possible to a link tree from a
> given library revision.
Seems to me that here is where update and replay can differentiate:
update:
undo
hardlink-get new revision
redo
replay:
dopatch 1..N
> Personally, I have no particular opinion abou that.
There was another patch from Pau to do this, I think it makes sense -
--link, -l.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Tom Lord, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Tom Lord, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Tom Lord, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Christopher Dale, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re:, Mark Thomas, 2003/12/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Mark Thomas, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Tom Lord, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Robert Collins, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc),
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Tom Lord, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Robert Collins, 2003/12/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Miles Bader, 2003/12/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Robert Collins, 2003/12/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Miles Bader, 2003/12/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/12/02
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/02