[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2 |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:34:20 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 08:59, Tom Lord wrote:
> > Really I have no objection to working it back in later. It just isn't
> > needed to have useful functionality and I'm not clear about why it
> > would be important. What "cute things" do you have in mind?
> The ones I described mainly: dynamically resigning an archive as you
> mirror it - perhaps to sign unsigned archives, or to note that a given
> maintainer is listed as having checked all the code.
Dynamic resigning will be the behavior under this proposal -- it's not
resigning that would require special handling of push-mirror.
The idea of multiple maintainers "signing off" on some piece of code
is a good one -- but I don't think it belongs at this level. Arch's
contribution there is just the namespace so that, in some ancillary
tool, people can say "so-and-so has signed off on patch-254".
> > > (Oh, archive-fs.c is -just about- dead here
> > > (address@hidden/tla--gpg--1.1)
> > Wow, that's good news!
> patch-2 is committed, mirrored and passes make test. Thats not to say
> that it's gold... but if you'd like to mirror and play....
Soon.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, David Brown, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Joshua Haberman, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, David Brown, 2003/12/08