[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions
From: |
Thomas Zander |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:51:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.94 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 15 December 2003 11:03, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> In the compliance with the established arch standard, it is proposed
> to store the deltas in $HOME/{deltas}
I'd throw in an additional .arch dir as that is the Unix standard.
Further: It might be that I misunderstood the arch naming but '{deltas}'
seems wrong to me when not used as a top-level dir; so make it a ,, dir.
So: $HOME/.arch/,,archive-deltas
> If a future need would arise to choose a default working source tree
> location, it is proposed to choose $HOME/{srctrees} for them to reside
> in.
You mean that you do a get (checkout) to that location? That seems wrong
since I doubt the user will want to work there; if only because his IDE
probably has a different default location.
What I do in my tool is that a file-dialog is shown and the location is
remembered so the next time a get is done it will be the default the user
will see.
In other words; you ask the user.
- --
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/3a5VCojCW6H2z/QRArqkAKCrPaL+z07nwdoNKqmtkm8+HiZH2QCgvdZM
gBZ8bPfXSaJoTmB/0QdpsJs=
=BUKS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Clark McGrew, 2003/12/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Miles Bader, 2003/12/15