[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:35:20 +1100 |
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 10:52, Tom Lord wrote:
> I think you are basically right but.....
>
> As a practical matter, the foundational problem to solve first is the
> "diff/patch" problem.
>
> Can you make a diff-like and patch-like pair of tools (and, ideally, a
> diff3-like tool) that are specialized for OO files? That interact
> very well with OO editors and so forth?
>
> Do that part first --- the arch part, after that, is pretty easy.
What about xdelta for binary files?
I've encountered a number of situations recently, where I've been unable
to use arch to revision control binary-file containing projects - due to
the size overhead.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?,
Robert Collins <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Charles Duffy, 2003/12/22