[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args.
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args. |
Date: |
12 Mar 2004 10:47:45 +0900 |
Jan Hudec <address@hidden> writes:
> IIRC it's only specified, that any type shorter than integer will be
> promoted to size of integer. And NO relation between sizeof(int),
> sizeof(long) and sizeof(void *) is claimed by specification whatsoever!
>
> It is known to hold on all widely used platforms that sizeof(int) <=
> sizeof(void *) <= sizeof(long), but no stricter relation holds.
Even when that relation holds, this particular case can screw you; for
it to `work', you need sizeof (int) == sizeof (whatever_ptr).
-Miles
--
"Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
where four map sheets join." -- Anon. British Officer in WW I
- [Gnu-arch-users] posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Robert Collins, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Tom Lord, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Miles Bader, 2004/03/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Andrew Suffield, 2004/03/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Jan Hudec, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args.,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Jan Hudec, 2004/03/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Miles Bader, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Andrew Suffield, 2004/03/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Andrew Suffield, 2004/03/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: posible issue on ia64 with va_args., Jan Hudec, 2004/03/18