[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 03:37:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 06:51:30PM -0600, Charles Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 17:33, Miles Bader wrote:
> > ...Charles' more general reworking of rev-building.
>
> Err, no, that's not me.
Yeah, I noticed in Tom's later message that it's Aaron [hope I got it right
this time -- the problem is I'm using mutt to read mail, so when I'm
composing a message, it's not simple to go back and look at other messages to
check my facts...] doing this work. Apologies to both.
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge, Cameron Patrick, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge, Miles Bader, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Sub-optimal ordering of rev-building in star-merge, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/12