[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree
|
From: |
mlh |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:32:13 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 02:26:15PM +0100, Peter Conrad wrote:
> What benefit is there in including the device number in the inode signatures?
Presumably because inode is not unique, only (device, inode) is unique.
Matt
- [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, C. R. Oldham, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, John Meacham, 2004/03/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, Miles Bader, 2004/03/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, John Meacham, 2004/03/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Corrupt pristine tree, Greek0, 2004/03/13
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, Anders Rune Jensen, 2004/03/13