[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cascading patchlogs with star-merge
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cascading patchlogs with star-merge |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:15:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
> >Its up to you and him to notice that the only thing that changed was
> >patch logs. If you star merge somebody and the only change you see is
> >patchlogs, then why would you commit that to your tree?
> >
> Why should I have to merge it to find out it's something I didn't want?
For the same reasons you can perform an empty command and that in order
to find out if there is anything "new" you have to attempt to merge to
see if there's anything at all.
Cheers,
jblack
--
James Blackwell Using I.T. to bring more 570-407-0488
Owner, Inframix business to your business http://inframix.com
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Cascading patchlogs with star-merge, Stig Brautaset, 2004/03/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cascading patchlogs with star-merge, Robert Collins, 2004/03/21