[Gnu-arch-users] tla changes doesn't descend into precious directories

[Aaron Bentley]

I take some of what I said back: tla changes doesn't descend into 
precious directories.

I was working in a copy of the tree that was missing .arch-inventory 
files, so the directories were considered source, and descended into. 
Of course, I had to work around the PANICs and botched invariants to 
find that out.

Actually, there is a case where tla ignores the fact that a directory is 
precious: when you cd to that directory and do "tla inventory".

Aaron

Robin Green wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>
> > - it would be really nice if tree inventories didn't descend into 
> > non-source directories.  These precious directories are frickin' huge, 
> > and running 'changes' takes forever, on my Athlon 2800+, with SATA and 
> > Reiser 3.
>
>
> According to the comments in the default =tagging-method file,
> precious directories are not descended into. Is this incorrect?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/

--
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.