Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: commit --tagging

[Aaron Bentley]

Tom Lord wrote:
>     > From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>
>
>     > Okay, I've basically got commit --base working, but there's no input 
>     > validation or qualifying.
>
>     > So I've got some UI questions:
>     > Is BASE allowed to be a version?  
>
>     > What about a patchlevel?  
>
>     > If no archive name is supplied, do we get it from the 
>     > tree-version or the default archive?
>
> It should behave analogously to `tag'.

Okay, will do.  And -S, I guess.

One difference between commit and tag is that commit always has access 
to logs.  I think tla commit --base $(logs -f $VERSION|tail -n) is more 
useful than tla commit --base $(revisions -f $VERSION|tail -n), but 
whatever.

Aaron

--
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.