[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when pa
From: |
David Allouche |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:06:05 +0200 |
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 21:25 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> If you want it yesterday:
> tla get --link foo--bar--0--patch-53 temp
> tla sync-tree -d temp foo--bar--0--patch-54
> tla apply-delta foo--bar--0--patch-53 temp $ACTUAL_TREE
> rm -R temp
That will not catch patchlog removal.
The "forget" command in tlash (in the tlash.d/features file) is a proof
of concept implementing the --only-changeset feature using only tla
operators.
It's unusably slow and clumsy, but it's a proof of concept.
--
-- ddaa
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified,
David Allouche <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, David Allouche, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Miles Bader, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Miles Bader, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Miles Bader, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified, Miles Bader, 2004/10/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Revlog (Re: [BUG] sync-tree should work like replay when patch-level is specified), David Allouche, 2004/10/07