[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft)
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft) |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:57:40 -0700 (PDT) |
[re cascades]
> On reflection, this is just a prism structure under a different name,
> plus a rule that there must be a single line of ancestry through all
> of them
Prisms were never presented as hierarchical or ordered and so to say
that cascades are special case of them is a stretch.
> (which is actually useless and should be ignored - this isn't
> used for anything, so regular freeform prism structure will work just
> the same; the freeform structure is just a set of 'cascades'
> anyway).
Jivera already commented on the possibility of tree-structured
cascades.
The linear structure of a cascade is quite useful for those who are
working on multi-phased but singular lines of development.
> This is what we've been doing for years, nothing to see here, move
> along...
It isn't how people have been submitting changes to the mainline --
not even close.
Now it is one of two approved methods for submitting changes to the
mainline.
Plenty to see here.
Thanks,
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft),
Thomas Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/04