[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit
From: |
Cameron Patrick |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:37:10 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i |
Anand Kumria wrote:
> [1]: tla import having -S and -s is a bad idea; perhaps -C,
> --create-archive would be less likely to confuse. I've typed in '-S' more
> than once.
--create-archive would be misleading as the option doesn't create an
archive, just creates the category/branch/version within it. I'd say
that there's a good case to be made for -S being the default on tag
and especially import, though.
Cameron.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Anand Kumria, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit,
Cameron Patrick <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, John S. Yates, Jr., 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, John Meinel, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Robert Collins, 2004/10/14