[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: darcs vs tla

[Anand Kumria]

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:47:30 -0800, Thomas Lord wrote:

> I opened my mind for this darcs thread and it looks like I'm going to wind
> up where I started:  they have some rather esoteric merge technology that
> could be added to arch;  aside from that, they are missing too much.  
> Would have been better if darcs had, in the first place, been done as an
> extension to arch.   Meanwhile, their novel merge tech is "on the list of
> things todo" but not a high priority.
> 
> (Does that sound insulting towards Darcs?   It doesn't at all if you
> regard darcs as a short-term R&D exploration.)

Time for 'a diagnosing darcs', then?

Cheers,
Anand