|
From: | John A Meinel |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch performance with large trees |
Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:40:55 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
Catalin Marinas wrote:
Do you realize that "tla changes --link" will re-link the tree without having to rebuild it?Miika Komu <address@hidden> writes:Our project (*) uses tla for storing a complete, modified linux kernel. tla 1.2 is far too slow for e.g. commits and listing changes with the configuration we use. Just yesterday I did a commit that finished in 15 minutes even with revision libraries (greedy+sparse).What machine are you using? Do you work over NFS? I also use arch for storing the Linux kernel and I'm quite happy with it. It is, indeed, better to hard-link to the revision library. I noticed that it gets slow with time so I re-create the tree with "tla get --link" from time to time.
Has anyone tried breaking up the kernel repository with configurations? It seems like the kernel would have some natural dividing lines that could be used to decrease how large the individual trees are.
John =:->
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |