Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Partial update

[Jan Hudec]

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 15:32:18 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Jan Hudec wrote:
> 
> >>star-merge is superset of update.
> 
> I used to think so, but it's not accurate when you look at trees that 
> have deliberately diverged.  Star-merge will throw away local changes 
> that were rejected by the other branch, and merge the two as closely as 
> possible.
> 
> Update, on the other hand, will retain local changes, and apply any 
> changes from the other tree since the last merge from other.

Well, I am not sure how update behave in presence of skipped
revisions. Star-merge <tree-version>-somepatch will not pull them in.
Replay will. Without skipped revisions, they should do the same (apply
diff between last applied patch and the requested one).

> This is why Fai supports "merge --update".  It also supports "merge 
> --update --diff3".
> 
> Aaron
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Bentley
> Director of Technology
> Panometrics, Inc.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec 
<address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature