[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] False "binary" files
From: |
Sergio Callegari |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] False "binary" files |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:40:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040619 |
First of all, apologizes to everybody for having resurrected a thread
that had already been deeply discussed.
I'm relatively new to this list and when I searched for previous stuff
on the topic I was searching "zip" and "tar.gz" while I should have
searched preprecommit to get to the right stuff.
Then a couple of questions...
I've had a look to pre-precommit and apparently it can do the job, but I
still see a couple of things that are not completely clear to me:
1) The docs I found on pre-pre-commit are very sparse. For instance the
arch tutorial does not mention it and I managed finding something on it
only on this list and the wiki. Can someone point me to a more
comprehensive source of info and possibly usage examples?
2) Has the preprecommit interface completely stabilized? Or is it likely
that the hooks might change in the future?
3) If I use preprecommit, then I get "weird" behaviour from changes,
lint and so...
Is there a way to use hooks also to pre-expand the compressed
archive automatically before running these and eliminating the expansion
after?
Actually it would be even better to have something "built in" in
arch to get something like
tla changes
...
ZM presentation.sxi
....
pointing the fact that a compressed archive "Z" type (Zip) has been
modified, without the need to deal with the individual changes in the
files it contains...
I guess this is what many "not-so-technical" users would expect. I
agree it wouldn't help solving conflicts... but if the originating file
is openoffice or whatever, one can expect the user to manually solve the
conflicts using openoffice anyway.
4) would it be possible/easy to build in arch per-project hooks, without
needing a "global hoot" seeking for hooks in the individual projects?
4) sorry, completely out of topic....
If one uses this list in "digest mode" or from the web interface at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/, is there a way to
answer to messages "in thread"?
Thanks to everybody
Sergio
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Miles Bader, 2005/02/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/02/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Jan Hudec, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Robert Collins, 2005/02/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, tomas, 2005/02/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] Re: False "binary" files, tomas, 2005/02/15
[Gnu-arch-users] False "binary" files,
Sergio Callegari <=