[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best beh
From: |
Matthieu Moy |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2005 22:44:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
baz missing removed the "-f, --full" option, and made it the default
behavior. While this can be a good thing (I always used -f
anyway ...), this makes it inconsistant with other commands displaying
revision lists (baz revisions, baz logs, ...).
Shouldn't we apply the same change (remove -f and make it the default)
to other bazaar commands? (I can do this myself, but I want opinions
on this)
Thanks,
--
Matthieu
- [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?,
Matthieu Moy <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, John A Meinel, 2005/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Robert Collins, 2005/05/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Robert Collins, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Tom Lord, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Arch revision namespace, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/24