Re: [Gnu-arch-users] polemic is not for its own sake

[James Blackwell]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:58:19PM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> 
> I decline to reply to James' message aside from this.

I'm not sure if you noticed, but I addressed the message only to you.


> Past experience with James suggests he is a stickler
> for closure, though: hence this comment.

I am. Thanks for letting me know you got it.


> Something about ducks and barrels combined with the fact
> that I engage in polemic with a practical aim which is
> higher than merely fighting  for fights sake.

/me headscratches

Does this mean that you like to examine issues, taking contemporary events
as a case in point? If so, cool.

-- 
 James Blackwell      |   Try out the blog planet for revision control
 Tell someone a joke! |   at http://planet.revisioncontrol.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400