[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] replies vs. new threads
From: |
Nikolai Weibull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] replies vs. new threads |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:15:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.8i |
Thomas Lord wrote:
> Adrian:
> > But you never "reply" to list messages. You just start new
> > threads. ;)
> For whatever reason, Evolution simply fails to deliver list mail
> if I use the reply button.
I read somewhere that they have a separate button for replying to list
mail...I haven't the slightest idea where it is, though, as I've never
used Evolution.
> It also crashes about once per week. It sometimes displays the
> edit cursor inaccurately. It treats pasting into a document
> very poorly. It lacks a set of text editing commands suitable
> for editing plain-text messages. It sometimes wraps lines for
> no good reason whatsoever. It provides extremely awkward facilities
> for searching the list of message headers in each folder. It
> does strange things with drag and drop, especially into the header
> fields of a message. I could go on.
Thank god that it's written in roughly one million lines of
object-oriented C code. At least that must count for something. Just
thinking about all the work that's gone into it should make you feel a
bit less critical of it ;-/.
> Presumably Gnomes transition to mono will fix all this, right?
Of course; it's based on MS technology, remember?,
nikolai
--
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}