[Gnu-arch-users] licensing clarification

[Thomas Lord]

I wrote:

  *Of course* I agree about the importance of software freedoms and
  will do my best to always chose GPL-compatible free software licenses
  but those points of agreement are insufficient, in my opinion, to 
  also stand as a public interface to an official GNU project.

The phrase "GPL-compatible" is too weak.

I will chose a GPL-compatible *copyleft* (i.e., similarly viral)
license whenever I can, usually the GPL itself.

I can *imagine* very obscure circumstances when I would do otherwise
but I don't expect them to come to pass.

-t