[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementat
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:57:47 +0100 |
It's basically a slight update of Johannes' patch so that current
OpenSSH and GNU lsh may both be used flawlessly (I didn't check
about the other implementations that it's supposed to support,
namely `fsecure' and `psftp').
Wonderful!
All this makes it possible to specify at run-time which SSH
implementation to use using the `TLA_SSH_TYPE' and `TLA_SSH_BINARY'
environment variables. Example:
One small comment, make the variable names a bit more generic and
descriptive and preferbly use an existing name. For example,
TLA_SSH_BINARY is bad since another GNU Arch implementation could
implement such a feature. Adding _BINARY is redundant too. I'd
prefer something like:
RSH
RSH_TYPE
Since you could in theory end up using plain old remote shell, or a
variant of it that encrypts the traffic or anything inbetween. I'm
also skeptical over the RSH_TYPE thing too, cannot this be specified
in some other way? By only using the RSH variable? Not even sure what
that variable does...
Wonderful patch though, I prefer using lsh over ssh so I'll enjoy this
one. :-)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Andy Tai, 2006/01/10
Message not available