[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness...
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness... |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:09:59 +0200 (CEST) |
Alfred> It is valid GNU C though,
Ain't no such thing.
Sure there is, (gcc)C Dialect Options:
| `gnu89'
| Default, ISO C90 plus GNU extensions (including some C99
| features).
| `gnu99'
| `gnu9x'
| ISO C99 plus GNU extensions. When ISO C99 is fully
| implemented in GCC, this will become the default. The name
| `gnu9x' is deprecated.
Alfred> and I think [declarations anywhere in a block] might be
Alfred> valid C99.
It is. For recent GCCs that default to -std=c99
GCC defaults to -std=gnu99 or -std=gnu89: (gcc)Standards
| The default, if no C language dialect options are given, is
| `-std=gnu89'; this will change to `-std=gnu99' in some future release
| when the C99 support is complete. Some features that are part of the
| C99 standard are accepted as extensions in C89 mode.
Cheers.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., Andy Tai, 2006/06/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: OpenBSD madness..., Miles Bader, 2006/06/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., Ludovic Courtès, 2006/06/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., Matthew Hannigan, 2006/06/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., Thomas Lord, 2006/06/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/06/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness...,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OpenBSD madness..., Andy Tai, 2006/06/28