[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:37:13 +0100 (CET) |
> > > You can create the Stephen J. Turnbull General Public
> > > License that only contains the legal parts that just
> > > happens to have the exact same terms as the GNU GPL.
> >
> > That is explicitly not permitted.
> >
> > I never wrote `modify the GNU GPL', I wrote `the exact same
> > terms'.
>
> That's right, you didn't write "modify". However, under the law
> what you describe would be considered modification.
>
> No, it would not, ideas cannot be copyrighted.
OK. Show us how to do it. For bonus points, get it certified as a
Free Software license by the FSF.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
What did I win?
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Andy Tai, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/17
Message not available
Message not available