[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNU-linux-libre] dyne:III and a text on linux-libre
From: |
Jaromil |
Subject: |
[GNU-linux-libre] dyne:III and a text on linux-libre |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:45:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
re all,
yesterday I've managed to release dyne:bolic 3.0.0 codename MUNIR
which represents a new course of development for our distribution,
also thanks to the review and suggestions contributed here.
here is the full release announcement:
http://ftp.dyne.org/dynebolic/README
Now I'm not writing you to announce the release also here :) trying my
best to not be a spammer in these occasions :) rather than point your
attention to a part of the text in the release which might be
interesting to expand and maybe adopt for projects like
http://h-node.com
Here below is the text I'm talking about: it elaborats a comparison
between the food system industry and the influence of patents and
proprietary technologies to that of the software world, so that it can
show the ethical reasons moving us to remove anything that is not 100%
free, also at the price of supporting less hardware (one of the most
common objections to our choice..)
Your comments and corrections are welcome, please also consider I'm
not a native english speaker..
It doesn't works on my computer! some cards are not found...
-------------------------------------------------------------
A big difference between dyne:bolic and other popular operating
systems around is that we adopt only 100% free software, which means
our system is free from proprietary software. The result is that we
can provide support for less hardware cards (video, network, wireless
and such): just those working transparently, following a well
documented protocol and running free and open source drivers that make
it clear to everyone what the device is doing. It is frustrating on
the short term to have such a limited hardware support, but we think
is worth on the long term because it gives everyone the freedom to
study, adapt and modify software and hardware and to clearly know what
is happening inside our machines.
* Why freedom is better on the long term?
To explain why this is important, let us propose you an example in a
different context, that of food production: many farmers in the World
have been told by the global mega-corporations that by buying and
using their proprietary chemicals and seeds their farms would be more
productive. The result of this corporate fraud is that farmers become
dependent from foreign and proprietary chemicals and seeds: they are
often genetically modified so that plants won't produce more seeds,
plus they are protected by patents so that farmers themselves cannot
study, adapt and redistribute the technology they are using. It even
gets worst, since these proprietary and globalised products cannot be
appropriate to the contexts they are used: not even the promise of
productivity is maintained and the soil gets poisoned by the ignorance
and inability of the mega-corporations that will never be able to
supply very different needs around the world.
Now, back to your computer :^) think of how important is the
technology you use to build your social interaction online, your
digital productions and audio/video creations. As the importance of
this technology grows in your life, so it grows the power of the
mega-corporations which are acting unethically by locking you out of
your own device, denying your freedom to study, modify, adapt and
redistribute all what you use. On the long term you will find yourself
depending from these technologies and being limited by them, you will
not be able to evolve and use your knowledge and skills at their full
potential. You'll be a mental slave trained to say yes to license
agreements progressively corroding your rights and interacting with
prefabricated interfaces which will limit your freedom and squeeze out
your time and money while doing that.
That's why we consciously eliminate support for the hardware that
closes you up in such traps. For instance if you are a digital artist,
using dyne:bolic or other 100% free operating systems you can be sure
that your creations can be preserved in time, without being held
hostage of proprietary technologies needed to reproduce them.
* Ok! so you think you're smart, hu? what should I do then?!
Next time you buy technology, think twice and choose wisely! here is a
useful initiative you can visit to find out which hardware is well
supported by free software: [http://www.h-node.com]
Liberate yourself from mental slavery!
--
jaromil, dyne.org developer, http://jaromil.dyne.org
GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Prev by Date:
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Freedom issues in lame, cdrkit, SDL, foomatic-filters, freepascal, unzip
- Next by Date:
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Freedom issues in lame, cdrkit, SDL, foomatic-filters, freepascal, unzip
- Previous by thread:
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Free software and open source
- Next by thread:
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] dyne:III and a text on linux-libre
- Index(es):